You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorials

  • LaPorte County steps up for Toll Road control
    The LaPorte County commissioners, the South Bend Tribune reports, have hired attorney Shaw Friedman to investigate whether the state can revoke its lease of the Indiana Toll Road now that its operator, ITR Concession Co.
  • The team for EACS
    “Two steps forward, one step back” could be the motto for the East Allen County Schools board, where efforts at district improvement seem inevitably to be disrupted by infighting and conflict.
  • LaPorte County steps up for Toll Road control
    The LaPorte County commissioners, the South Bend Tribune reports, have hired attorney Shaw Friedman to investigate whether the state can revoke its lease of the Indiana Toll Road now that its operator, ITR Concession Co.
Advertisement

Path open to an Open Door ruling

While the Indiana State Board of Education’s political battle with state Superintendent Glenda Ritz rages on, a Marion County judge has ruled the board’s legal battle also will continue.

Judge Cynthia Ayers denied the board’s request to dismiss a suit by a group of plaintiffs that includes Julia Hollingsworth of the Fort Wayne Community Schools board. The suit alleges the 10 state board members violated Indiana’s Open Door Law when they authorized – by email – the addition of their signatures to a letter sent to Senate President Pro Tem David Long and House Speaker Brian Bosma regarding Ritz’s handling of school A to F data. Indiana law requires all official action by governing boards of public agencies be open to the public.

The Indiana attorney general’s office first argued that the lawsuit did not meet the 30-day deadline for challenging an action. The judge rejected that motion and another that argued that no violation occurred because no meeting took place. Ayers cited a provision in the state law noting that “It is the intent of this chapter that the official action of public agencies be conducted and taken openly ... in order that the people be fully informed.”

The ruling clears the way for the plaintiffs’ attorney to examine internal documents in preparation for trial. A final ruling could provide the needed case law in matters involving electronic communication by board members – a practice that clearly violates the spirit of Indiana’s Open Door Law.

Advertisement