You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorials

  • Carmel's pool of money to fix a pool
    Fort Wayne City Council members reluctantly gave the go-ahead to use Legacy Fund money to cover costs from the past winter’s extensive cleanup.
  • LaPorte County steps up for Toll Road control
    The LaPorte County commissioners, the South Bend Tribune reports, have hired attorney Shaw Friedman to investigate whether the state can revoke its lease of the Indiana Toll Road now that its operator, ITR Concession Co.
  • The team for EACS
    “Two steps forward, one step back” could be the motto for the East Allen County Schools board, where efforts at district improvement seem inevitably to be disrupted by infighting and conflict.
Advertisement
Call for higher standards
House Speaker Brian Bosma said a review of the state’s ethics laws will begin this summer. Pressure placed on current lawmakers, many of whom face challengers on Election Day, will ensure the review takes place. Contact your state senator and representative to call for ethics guidelines that do not excuse conflicts of interest as an unavoidable consequence of a part-time legislature.
Senate switchboard:
800-382-9467
House switchboard:
800-382-9842
Editorial

Voters must step in on ethics rules – where lawmakers refuse to act

Turner
Bosma

When do a citizen lawmaker’s efforts at exerting influence become a conflict of interest? The Indiana General Assembly can’t seem to figure it out, giving a pass to a legislative leader who used his position to benefit his family business. As House Speaker Pro Tem P. Eric Turner walks away from an ethics scandal unbruised and nearly $2 million richer, it’s time that voters demand the higher standards legislators have failed to approve.

House Speaker Brian Bosma said this week that Turner will not be sanctioned by the House after an ethics investigation determined he did not violate current rules.

“The ethics committee completed its review, and the review was to take no action but to take a hard look at our disclosure statutes and statements, and that’s what we’re doing now,” Bosma said Tuesday.

Turner, the speaker’s second-in-command, abstained from voting in public. But he lobbied in the GOP caucus to kill a proposed moratorium on new nursing home construction. His behind-closed-door dealings angered at least one colleague, who pointed out to the members of the media that Turner was an investor in his son’s nursing home development company. The moratorium, proposed by Republican Sen. Patricia Miller, threatened multiple projects planned by Mainstreet Property Group, a company owned by the lawmaker, his son and several others. The state offered $345,000 in tax credits for a Terre Haute project that Mainstreet documents show will earn Turner about $1.8 million.

If one House Republican showed character in disclosing Turner’s hypocrisy, it’s fair for voters to wonder why the others supported his bid to kill the nursing home moratorium.

How did the Cicero businessman convince them that their Senate colleagues were wrong about the legislation? Were the others uncomfortable with Turner’s lobbying? Did he convince House members that his conflict did not compromise the integrity of the General Assembly?

We’ll never know. But we can remind all legislators that the low bar Turner was able to clear is in sharp contrast to legislative standards elsewhere. His actions would not have been allowed in Kentucky, where tough standards were recently revised to become even tougher.

Lawmakers in the Bluegrass State apparently recognized that a Statehouse scandal harmed the reputations of more than the 18 lobbyists and lawmakers convicted on corruption charges. The scandal led to the creation of an independent nine-member board that oversees lawmakers and lobbyists.

With many veteran lawmakers choosing retirement, the young and inexperienced group of Indiana legislators needs to hear the lessons of Martin K. “Chip” Edwards, Phillip E. Gutman and Michael K. Phillips. Once respected leaders, each was involved in a scandal that ended his political career and harmed the reputation of the entire legislature.

As the General Assembly begins to consider tightening its rules, it needs to hear from voters. A part-time legislature served by citizen-lawmakers shouldn’t serve as a cover for glaring conflicts of interest.

Advertisement