You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Business

  • New Pimco chief could bring relief to fund giant
    NEW YORK – With Bill Gross' surprise departure from Pimco, 45-year-old Daniel Ivascyn now finds himself watching over trillions in assets at the huge mutual fund firm.
  • PayPal, eBay going their separate ways
    NEW YORK – PayPal's impending split from longtime partner eBay Inc. will ratchet up its appeal to online retail competitors such as Amazon.com and give it the freedom to aggressively take on new mobile pay challenger Apple Pay.
  • US prices for homes lose steam
    WASHINGTON – U.S. home prices in July increased at the slowest pace in 20 months, reflecting sluggish sales and a greater supply of houses for sale.
Advertisement

US wins bout with China-set car tariffs

Froman

– The United States has scored a victory before the World Trade Organization in a case that challenged China’s imposition of penalty tariffs on the sale of $5 billion in U.S.-made vehicles in China.

A WTO panel ruled Friday that China’s tariffs violated international trade rules. The ruling came during a week when the U.S. Justice Department charged five Chinese military officers with hacking into U.S. companies’ computer systems to steal trade secrets.

The two developments pointed to intensifying trade tensions between the world’s two biggest economies.

The dispute panel for the WTO sided with the United States in its ruling. It said China had acted inconsistently in imposing the anti-dumping requirements in violation of its WTO commitments.

U.S. officials said China withdrew the tariffs in December in response to indications that it would lose the WTO case. Officials said they pushed forward with the case to establish the precedent that China’s actions violated global trade rules.

The WTO allows countries to raise import duties to offset improper subsidies and dumping. But the complaint the Obama administration filed in 2012 accused Beijing of improperly imposing the anti-dumping duties.

The administration contended that China’s tariffs were imposed in retaliation for penalty tariffs the administration had levied on Chinese-made tires.

China had defended the duties on U.S.-made vehicles as legal under international rules. It asserted that the administration’s bailouts of General Motors Corp. and Chrysler amounted to unfair government subsidies. China’s duties affected cars and sport-utility vehicles with engines of 2.5 liters or larger.

U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said the WTO ruling would benefit America’s nearly 850,000 autoworkers. China has become America’s second-largest auto export market. In 2013, the United States exported $64.9 billion of autos, with $8.5 billion of that total going to China.

Froman said the penalty duties, ranging up to 21.5 percent, hit $5.1 billion of America’s auto exports to China last year. The penalties covered such popular models as the Jeep Grand Cherokee, the Cadillac Escalade and the Buick Enclave.

Advertisement