You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Sunday Centerpiece

  • A call for help
    We've all seen this story in the news: a child barely out of diapers dials 911 and tells the operator that mommy is hurt and unconscious on the kitchen floor.
  • A call for help
    We’ve all seen this story in the news: a child barely out of diapers dials 911 and tells the operator that mommy is hurt and unconscious on the kitchen floor.
  • Climate will change
    Facts are stubborn things, John Adams once said. But sometimes it's more convenient to deny them. Men walked on the moon? That was a hoax. The Holocaust?
Advertisement

Patient’s civil liberties a missing consideration

The editorial by Ramesh Ponnuru summarizes many of the key points of two pieces of rival legislation related to mental illness. While the primary sponsors of the two bills would likely agree on many points if they sat face to face, there is a fundamental issue on which they, and many other informed people, disagree. It is the issue of balancing the civil liberties of someone with a major mental illness with the need for treatment and control. For instance:

•Should someone be forced into treatment or forced to take medications if they are psychotic but not dangerous?

•Should providers be able to talk to family members and coordinate care without the patient’s consent?

•If someone is not thinking coherently, do they get to choose?

There is no easy answer to this quandary, but it deserves to be considered on merit, not the politics involved.

Paul Wilson is president and CEO of Park Center. He wrote this for The Journal Gazette.

Advertisement