You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Sunday Centerpiece

  • Daniels' toll coming due
    To doubt the wisdom of the lease of the Indiana Toll Road, as many have from the beginning, does not prevent one from acknowledging its benefits.
  • Commit to the Constitution
    When Americans debate important legal questions involving the Constitution – guns, gay marriage, police surveillance, affirmative action, to name just a few – our founding document often ends up seeming like a Rorschach blot
  • Well-founded fear in Ferguson, here
     I was in suburban St. Louis for my mother's 70th birthday. And then Ferguson happened. My parents had long since abandoned their once-happy, urban home in the city of St.

Patient’s civil liberties a missing consideration

The editorial by Ramesh Ponnuru summarizes many of the key points of two pieces of rival legislation related to mental illness. While the primary sponsors of the two bills would likely agree on many points if they sat face to face, there is a fundamental issue on which they, and many other informed people, disagree. It is the issue of balancing the civil liberties of someone with a major mental illness with the need for treatment and control. For instance:

•Should someone be forced into treatment or forced to take medications if they are psychotic but not dangerous?

•Should providers be able to talk to family members and coordinate care without the patient’s consent?

•If someone is not thinking coherently, do they get to choose?

There is no easy answer to this quandary, but it deserves to be considered on merit, not the politics involved.

Paul Wilson is president and CEO of Park Center. He wrote this for The Journal Gazette.