You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.


  • Japan earthquake causes injuries, collapses homes
    TOKYO – A strong earthquake late Saturday struck a mountainous area of central Japan that hosted the 1998 winter Olympics, knocking down at least 10 homes in a ski resort town and injuring several people, officials said.
  • Kerry says gaps remain in talks about Iran’s nukes
    VIENNA – U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned of “serious gaps” in talks about a nuclear deal with Iran, but as Monday’s deadline approached his German counterpart said Tehran and six world powers have
  • Mali: New Ebola case confirmed, 2 more suspected
    BAMAKO, Mali – Mali on Saturday confirmed a new case of Ebola and said two more suspected patients are being tested, raising concern about a further spread of the disease which has already killed at least five people in the country.

EU high court upholds privacy in Google case

Europe’s highest court stunned the U.S. tech industry Tuesday by recognizing an expansive right to privacy that allows citizens to demand that Google delete links to embarrassing personal information – even if it’s true.

The ruling has potentially wide-ranging consequences for an industry that reaps billions of dollars in profit by collecting, sorting and redistributing data touching on the lives of people worldwide. That includes more than 500 million people in the European Union who now could unleash a flood of deletion requests that Google would have little choice but to fulfill, no matter how cumbersome.

The impact on American users was not immediately clear, though companies sometimes seek to adopt uniform policies around the world to simplify compliance.

Other U.S. tech companies, including Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and Yahoo, have services that feature information about private citizens and may have to alter their practices in Europe to comply with the precedent set by the Google ruling, legal experts said. The ruling may also inspire similar legal challenges elsewhere in the world.

“It’s a very important decision. It is far-reaching, and it will have a big impact on the Internet industry,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. “The European Court of Justice is making it extremely clear that privacy is a fundamental right.”

The case, which grew from the frustrations of a Spanish man unhappy that searches of his name featured links to a tax problem from 1998, hinged on whether the public’s right to know outweighed a private citizen’s desire to leave behind unpleasant personal history, an idea crystallized by the increasingly popular European phrase “the right to be forgotten.”

The EU’s Court of Justice, based in Luxembourg and roughly equivalent to the U.S. Supreme Court, embraced the concept in part; it ruled that even though a Spanish newspaper had the right to publish information online about the man’s tax problems, Google had no right to provide links to it if the man objected.

The distinction drew on the different missions and reaches of the institutions. The Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia was fulfilling “journalistic purposes,” the court said, while Google was merely “processing personal data” in a way that, because of the massive distribution power of the Internet, threatened “fundamental rights to privacy.”

The ruling does recognize a different standard for public figures and for data that has scientific or historic value, but when it comes to information about ordinary private citizens, Internet companies often will have to remove links to personal information upon request, something that could prove expensive and time-consuming.

Google said Tuesday that it was uncertain of its next move. “This is a disappointing ruling for search engines and online publishers in general,” the company said in a statement. “ … We now need to take time to analyze the implications.”

Andrew McLaughlin, a former Google policy official who later worked in the Obama White House, called the European decision “a travesty.”

“This strikes me as a typical European-elite ruling that is dressed up as a privacy ruling when it’s really censorship,” he said.

European attitudes toward privacy and data protection are markedly different from those in the United States, where openness is the presumption and courts are reluctant to bar factual information from the public record.

Many Europeans say that their fears are guided by memories of invasive dictatorship – whether Francisco Franco in Spain, the Communist regime in East Germany or Nazi rule over much of the continent.

The worries shape personal habits; in Germany, for example, many Internet users still choose email addresses that have nothing to do with their names.

Last year’s revelations about widespread monitoring of electronic communications by the U.S. National Security Agency sparked a furious response in Brussels, where E.U. lawmakers made regulating data a major focus of their legislative agenda.

European leaders vowed to take steps to protect their citizens’ online privacy. In Germany, some officials even suggested constructing a German-only network where users could be assured that German laws on privacy and data protection would be obeyed.

“Today’s Court Judgement is a clear victory for the protection of personal data of Europeans!” wrote Viviane Reding, the European Commission member who spearheaded the drive for a data policy overhaul, on her Facebook page Tuesday. “Companies can no longer hide behind their servers being based in California or anywhere else in the world.”