You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

World

  • Iran: Nuclear talks may focus on an extension
    With a deadline approaching for a nuclear deal, an Iranian official said Sunday that the discussion may soon have to shift from trying to reach an agreement to extending negotiations past the target date.
  • Islamic State group recruits, exploits children
    Teenagers carrying weapons stand at checkpoints and busy intersections in Iraq's second-largest city, Mosul. Patched onto the left arms of their black uniforms are the logos of the Islamic Police.
  • Homes collapse, 39 injured in Japan earthquake
    Helicopter surveys on Sunday showed more extensive damage than earlier thought from an overnight earthquake in the mountainous central Japan area that hosted the 1998 Winter Olympics.
Advertisement
Washington Post
Where’s Ukraine? Each dot depicts the location where a U.S. survey respondent situated the former Soviet republic; the dots are colored based on how far removed they are from the actual country, with the most accurate responses in red and the least accurate ones in blue.
Analysis

Worst at maps want most action in Ukraine

Since Russian troops entered the Crimean peninsula in early March, a series of media polling outlets have asked Americans how they want the United States to respond to the ongoing situation. Although two-thirds of Americans have reported following the situation at least “somewhat closely,” most Americans actually know very little about events on the ground – or even where the ground is.

From March 28 to 31, we asked a national sample of 2,066 Americans (fielded by Survey Sampling International Inc.) what action they wanted the U.S. to take in Ukraine, but with a twist: We also asked our survey respondents to locate Ukraine on a map as part of a larger, ongoing project to study foreign-policy knowledge.

We found that only 1 out of 6 Americans can find Ukraine on a map, and this lack of knowledge is related to preferences: The farther their guesses were from Ukraine’s actual location, the more they wanted the U.S. to intervene with military force.

Survey respondents identified Ukraine by clicking on a high-resolution world map. Most thought Ukraine was located somewhere in Europe or Asia, but the median respondent was about 1,800 miles off – roughly the distance from Chicago to Los Angeles – locating Ukraine somewhere in an area bordered by Portugal on the west, Sudan on the south, Kazakhstan on the east, and Finland on the north.

Members of military households were no more likely to correctly locate Ukraine (16.1 percent correct) than members of nonmilitary households (16 percent correct), but self-identified independents (29 percent correct) outperformed Democrats (14 percent correct) and Republicans (15 percent correct).

Unsurprisingly, college graduates (21 percent correct) were more likely to know where Ukraine was than non-college graduates (13 percent correct), but even 77 percent of college graduates failed to correctly place Ukraine on a map. The proportion of college grads who could correctly identify Ukraine is only slightly higher than the proportion of Americans who told Pew that President Barack Obama was Muslim in August 2010.

Even controlling for a series of demographic characteristics and participants’ general foreign-policy attitudes, we found that the less accurate our participants were, the more they wanted the U.S. to use force; the greater the threat they believe Russia poses to U.S. interests; and the more they thought that using force would advance U.S. national security interests.

Does it really matter whether Americans can put Ukraine on a map? Previous research would suggest yes: Information, or the absence thereof, can influence Americans’ attitudes about the kind of policies they want their government to carry out and the ability of elites to shape that agenda.

The authors are political scientists – Dropp at Dartmouth College, Kertzer at Harvard University and Zeitzoff at Princeton University.

Advertisement