You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Business

  • Existing clients given top home equity deals
    WASHINGTON – “Them that's got are them that gets,” Ray Charles sang in the 1960s. That sentiment rings true today in the U.S. mortgage market.
  • Glassmaker for iPhone to cut jobs
    A manufacturer of sapphire glass that Apple Inc. uses in iPhones plans to eliminate 727 jobs at an Arizona plant. GT Advanced Technologies filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection this month.
  • Oil price drop shakes up globe
    NEW YORK – A sudden plunge in the price of oil is sending economic and political shockwaves around the world.
Advertisement
Associated Press
A patent dispute between Apple and Samsung – which make the iPhone, left, and Galaxy – isn’t the only cellphone battle a judge is dealing with.

Phones in courtroom biggest hitch in patent trial

Koh

– So far, one of the biggest problems for a federal judge overseeing a patent battle between the world’s largest smartphone makers isn’t about stolen ideas. It’s getting the roomful of smartphone devotees to turn off their devices.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has become increasingly frustrated during the first few days of the trial pitting Apple against Samsung because the many personal Wi-Fi signals interfere with a network the judge relies on for a real-time transcript of the proceedings.

The phones also ring, buzz and jingle and can be used to take photos, a serious violation of court rules.

In the first five days of trial, Koh has interrupted testimony with a sharp “Phones off!” She’s warned she might force everyone to hand over their phones. She’s threatened to send everyone, except a select few, into an overflow room. And she’s shamed those with phones turned on to “Stand up!” – which a few sheepishly did.

The disturbances are unusual for a federal court, which is typically a quiet space with respect for tradition and decorum. There’s no snacking or chatting, no newspaper rustling or recording.

“Everyone make sure your cellphones are off so we don’t have the same real-time issue we’ve been having,” courtroom deputy Martha Parker-Brown warned Tuesday.

Already that morning, before the judge or jury had entered the courtroom, unusual shouts of “hey, hey, hey, hey, hey!” rang out as Apple attorney William Lee pointed at Wharton School marketing professor David Reibstein, who was taking photos from the spectator rows. Reibstein was escorted out, questioned by a marshal and required to erase the photos.

“I’ve never been in a federal trial before,” Reibstein said after he was allowed to return. “I just didn’t know the court rules.”

Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. are accusing each other, once again, of ripping off designs and features. The trial marks the latest round in a long-running series of lawsuits between the two tech giants, and it’s being tried less than two years after a federal jury found Samsung was infringing on Apple patents.

Samsung was ordered to pay about $900 million but is appealing. This time, Apple is accusing Samsung of infringing on five patents on newer devices. At stake is more than $2 billion if Samsung loses, about $6 million if Apple loses.

The high-profile case has packed the courtroom, with dozens of black-suited attorneys backed by rows of reporters and experts.

Executives and staff members from the two companies sit on opposite sides of the courtroom and whip out their respective phones during breaks.

“It’s a case of connection addiction,” Columbia University religious studies professor Robert A.F. Thurman said when he was told about the drama. “They’re afraid to be on their own, without some sort of artificial assistance. It needs to be treated by some kind of contemplative therapy.”

Advertisement