You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

U.S.

  • Southern California prepares for big storm surf
    Sand bags and surfers populated Southern California beaches Tuesday in anticipation of potentially damaging surf spawned by Hurricane Marie spinning off Mexico’s Pacific coast.
  • Mexican president praises California policies
    Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto praised Gov. Jerry Brown and state lawmakers Tuesday for approving a series of immigrant-friendly laws, saying California is taking a lead role in the absence of national immigration reform.
  • Mother of newborn baby found in trash arrested
    A Utah woman accused of dumping her day-old baby in a neighbor’s trash can told police she was afraid to tell her parents about the pregnancy and hoped the newborn’s death would solve her problems, a probable cause statement
Advertisement
Associated Press
Margot Riphagen of New Orleans wears a birth control pills costume as she protests in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday in Washington.

Birth control to high court

Justices weigh contraceptive coverage battle

– A divided Supreme Court seemed inclined to agree Tuesday that the religious objections of business owners may protect them from a requirement in President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act that health insurance plans cover all types of contraceptives.

The conservative wing of the court seemed to agree that the challengers in the two cases – closely held corporations owned by families whose religious beliefs the government does not question – could be covered by a federal law that provides great protection for the exercise of religion.

As is often the case, Justice Anthony Kennedy – who voted two years ago to find Obama’s health care law unconstitutional – seemed to hold the deciding vote.

Some of his remarks and questions favored the government. He was concerned about workers being denied coverage to which they were entitled by law. But Kennedy also raised the worry that the government’s reasoning would mean there was little employers could object to funding.

Kennedy told Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. that under Verrilli’s view, a corporation “could be forced in principle to pay for abortions.” Verrilli said there are laws against that.

“But your reasoning would permit that,” Kennedy responded.

The three liberal and female justices were skeptical and aggressive questioners of Paul Clement, the Washington lawyer representing two companies that object to providing coverage for emergency contraception and intrauterine devices.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan continually pressed Clement on whether his argument could be extended to other issues.

“So another employer comes in, and that employer says, ‘I have a religious objection to sex discrimination laws.’ And then another employer comes in, ‘I have a religious objection to minimum wage laws.’ And then another, family leave. And then another, child labor laws,” Kagan said.

Clement said that there is no reason to believe that would happen and that courts could decide whether such claims had merit.

Advertisement