You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

U.S.

  • Social Security's $300 million IT project doesn't work
    WASHINGTON – After spending nearly $300 million on a new computer system to handle disability claims, the Social Security Administration still can’t get it to work. And officials can’t say when it will.
  • 2 dead, 20 hurt after storm at Va. campground
    CAPE CHARLES, Va. – A fierce storm packing powerful winds and rain toppled trees and flipped campers Thursday at a Virginia campground, killing at least two people and sending at least 20 more to hospitals, officials said.
  • Sedative is common thread in 3 lengthy executions
    A common denominator for three lengthy executions this year is midazolam, a sedative often given to patients prior to surgery.
Advertisement
Associated Press
Female soldiers train on a firing range while wearing new body armor at Fort Campbell, Ky. A new survey found that only a small fraction of Army women want to move into combat jobs.

Women cool to combat jobs

Both genders nervous about evolving role, survey finds

– Only a small fraction of Army women say they’d like to move into one of the newly opening combat jobs, but those few who do say they want a job that takes them right into the heart of battle, according to preliminary results from a survey of the service’s nearly 170,000 women.

That survey and others across the Army, publicly disclosed for the first time to The Associated Press, also revealed that soldiers of both genders are nervous about women entering combat jobs but say they are determined to do it fairly. Men are worried about losing their jobs to women; women are worried they will be seen as getting jobs because of their gender and not their qualifications. Both are emphatic that the Army must not lower standards to accommodate women.

Less than 8 percent of Army women who responded to the survey said they wanted a combat job. Of those, an overwhelming number said they’d like to be a Night Stalker – a member of the elite special-operations helicopter crews who perhaps are best known for flying the Navy SEALS into Osama bin Laden’s compound in 2011.

Last year, top Pentagon officials signed an order saying women must have the same opportunities as men in combat jobs, and the services have been devising updated physical standards, training, education and other programs for thousands of jobs they must open Jan. 1, 2016. The services must open as many jobs to women as possible; if they decide to keep some closed, they must explain why.

Throughout last year, the Army emailed questionnaires to active duty, reserves and Army National Guard members to gauge soldiers’ views on the move to bring women into combat jobs. The results from the survey sent to women showed that just 2,238 – or 7.5 percent – of the 30,000 who responded said they would want one of the infantry, armor, artillery and combat engineer jobs.

Army officials also polled men and women on their concerns about the integration. And they asked senior female leaders to say whether they would have chosen combat jobs if they’d been given that chance 10 or 20 years ago.

All agreed the physical standards for the jobs should remain the same.

“The men don’t want to lower the standards because they see that as a perceived risk to their team,” said David Brinkley, deputy chief of staff for operations at the Army’s Training and Doctrine Command. “The women don’t want to lower the standards because they want the men to know they’re just as able as they are to do the same task.”

The questionnaires, and the focus groups that followed them, showed that younger men and those who have served with women in the last two years are more open to the integration, while midlevel soldiers – particularly those in units such as infantry and armor that have not included women – were more hesitant.

And there were nagging stereotypes. Male soldiers fretted that their unit’s readiness will be degraded because of what they term “women issues,” such as pregnancy and menstrual cycles.

Or they worried that women incapable of the physical demands would be brought in anyway.

Officers were concerned about sexual harassment and improper relationships. And the idea of integrated units bothered both military wives and husbands.

Plagued by an increase in reported sexual assaults, the military is putting a greater emphasis on training, reporting and treatment. But that increased focus, Brinkley said, has prompted some troops to say they are worried to be in the same room together.

The men, said Brinkley, worry that anything they say could ruin their careers.

“Did we have a problem? Yes. Are we aggressively solving it? Yes,” said Brinkley, adding: “We’ve kind of created a little environment of fear, which we fear might frankly hinder integration.”

The solution, Brinkley and other Army leaders said, involves education, training and good leadership.

Advertisement