You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.


  • With incentives and brute force, IS subdues tribes
    BEIRUT (AP) — The Islamic State group is employing multiple tactics to subdue the Sunni Muslim tribes in Syria and Iraq under its rule, wooing some with gifts — everything from cars to feed for their animals — while brutally
  • Afghan attack targets British embassy car, 5 dead
    KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — A suicide bomber attacked a British embassy vehicle in the Afghan capital Kabul today, killing at least five Afghan civilians and wounding more than 30 others, officials said.
  • Japan's reporter pleads innocent in S. Korea trial
    SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — A Japanese reporter today pleaded not guilty to charges of defaming South Korea's president by reporting rumors that she was absent for seven hours during a ferry disaster in April because she was with a man.
Talks for prisoner’s release suspended
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – Afghanistan’s Taliban says it has suspended mediation with the United States to exchange captive U.S. soldier Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five senior Taliban prisoners held in U.S. custody in Guantanamo Bay, halting – at least temporarily – what was considered the best chance yet of securing the 27-year-old’s freedom since his capture in 2009.
In a terse Pashto language statement emailed to the Associated Press on Sunday, Zabihullah Mujahed blamed the “current complex political situation in the country” for the suspension.
The Taliban spokesman did not elaborate on what “political situation” in Afghanistan led to the suspension of talks or say when they might resume. Afghanistan is in the middle of a presidential election campaign.
Bergdahl, of Hailey, Idaho, was last seen in a video released in December.
– Associated Press
Associated Press
President Obama is considering options for a U.S. military presence in Afghanistan beyond this year. Negotiations have halted with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and instead focus on leading candidates.

Obama weighs troop options

Afghanistan plans include full presence or withdrawal

One of the four options President Obama is considering for a U.S. military presence in Afghanistan beyond this year would leave behind 3,000 troops, in Kabul and at the existing U.S. installation at Bagram, U.S. officials said.

Military commanders have recommended a far more expansive 10,000 troops, with more installations across the country.

But the military has spent the past several months studying what kind of reduced counterterrorism and training operations it could conduct under the smaller option, which is favored by some in the White House.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel plans to brief NATO defense ministers in Brussels this week on the status of U.S. decision making. A senior administration official said that no announcement of specific troop numbers was planned but added that “we’ll have to tell people where we stand in our thinking and planning.”

During a December visit to Kabul, Hagel suggested the late-February NATO meeting was a “cutoff point” for Afghan President Hamid Karzai to sign the bilateral security agreement that sets out the terms for an ongoing U.S. presence. Although the accord was finalized in the fall, Karzai has since refused to sign it, leaving the administration to delay its decision on numbers while threatening a complete pullout when the last combat troops leave at the end of 2014.

“Nothing’s changed about our desire to get … (an) agreement, because without one, we’re going to have to start planning for a complete withdrawal,” Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John F. Kirby said Thursday.

Conversations with Karzai over the agreement have largely ceased, one U.S. official said. “We’ve taken the position that we shouldn’t harass him anymore, because it doesn’t get us anywhere,” the official said.

Instead, administration officials are in contact with leading candidates for Afghanistan’s April elections to replace Karzai, all of whom have said they would sign the agreement.

Under the 10,000-troop option, U.S. forces would remain in Kabul, Kandahar, Bagram and Jalalabad until the end of 2015, with 5,000 NATO and other international troops based in the northern and western parts of the country as part of a combined NATO mission called Resolute Support.

A second option would base a somewhat smaller number of U.S. troops in Kabul and Bagram until 2016, with authorization to travel across the country to train and advise Afghan forces as needed. Under the proposals, Option 1 could also merge into Option 2, with the entire force scheduled to leave by the end of Obama’s term.

The 3,000 troops under Option 3 would be restricted to Kabul and Bagram, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity about administration decision making. A portion of the existing Bagram air base ideally would be available for military use to operate drone aircraft, but troops would not travel across the country.

The fourth and final option calls for a complete U.S. withdrawal, a prospect for which the White House sees little immediate political fallout. Washington Post polls have shown that a majority of Americans believe the war was not worth fighting — 66 percent in a December survey.

A Gallup poll this month indicated that for the first time the number of Americans who believe U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan was a mistake is equal to the number who say it was not.