You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.



Senate committee advances Allen county-executive ballot

INDIANAPOLIS – Allen County voters would cast ballots in November on whether to establish a single-executive style of county government under a bill passed by the Senate Elections Committee on Monday.

A 30-page amendment was added to a bill involving minor elections provisions that had nothing to do with government structure.

It was also done without notice to the public. While House Bill 1318 was listed for a hearing, there was no indication that an Allen County amendment would be considered, and the amendment itself wasn’t made public until after the meeting.

The only people there to testify in support were Allen County Council President Darren Vogt and representatives of Greater Fort Wayne Inc. and the Regional Chamber of Northeast Indiana.

The language is just two votes away from becoming law if the bill passes the Senate and the House concurs on changes to the legislation.

Sen. Pete Miller, R-Avon, offered the amendment, calling it a voluntary option for Allen County only and saying the Senate passed language last year.

But last year’s effort had full public hearings in the House and the Senate. And it required the three members of the Allen County Commissioners first to vote on sending the proposal to a referendum.

House Bill 1318 automatically triggers a referendum for this fall with no involvement from the three current county commissioners.

“You are asking three people to vote against themselves. I don’t think that’s fair,” said Rep. Martin Carbaugh, R-Fort Wayne.

The language that was inserted is from a bill he filed in the House that didn’t receive a hearing.

He also noted that the public will have the ultimate say when it matters - at the ballot box.

The referendum question would essentially be whether the county should move to a single county executive system, alongside a larger county council with legislative and fiscal powers. It is similar to how a mayor and city council run a city.

If the referendum passes, the first Allen County single county executive would be elected in the 2018 general election and the county commissioners’ board would be abolished Jan. 1, 2019.

The county council would jump from seven members – four districts and three at-large members - to nine single-member districts.

An email from Allen County lobbyist Beth Lock to Greater Fort Wayne Inc. lobbyist Katy Stafford-Cunningham said the majority of the commissioners have stated they will not oppose a referendum on the issue.

“Beyond that, the board is not prepared to comment. We will NOT testify in committee. We will continue to focus our efforts towards our top legislative priorities as outlined before session,” the email said.

Scott Glaze, chairman and CEO of Fort Wayne Metals, testified that it is more efficient to have a single county executive than three commissioners. He said there have been problems in the past with commissioners on economic development issues.

“It makes the job of economic development difficult not having a single authority,” he said.

Sen. Jim Banks, R-Columbia City, voted against the amendment, noting he isn’t passionately for or against the concept.

But he said it’s a 30-page rewrite of Allen County government, and “I would prefer for it to move through the process like other bills.”

Katrina Hall, of Indiana Farm Bureau, testified against the bill on behalf of her group and specifically the Allen County Farm Bureau. She said her members believe the current three county commissioner system provides better geographic representation.

“They are concerned a single county executive would be less accessible to them and more expensive,” Hall said.

The state county commissioners association didn’t testify but the chairman said the association opposes the bill.

One of the major concerns by those groups is that the bill will be widened to apply to other areas of the state, not just Allen County. An effort to do so last year killed the bill in the House.