Conservatives are once again touting marriage as the way out of poverty. They point to U.S. census data showing that poverty is concentrated in single-parent families and that marriage is highly correlated with more successful households and higher-achieving children.
Marriage by itself doesnt lift people out of poverty – certainly not as well as policies that encourage and enable parents to work.
Equally important, correlation isnt the same as causation. If it were, wed be celebrating the decline of marriage. After all, in the past 50 years, poverty has decreased along with the rate of marriage.
The conservative argument, at any rate, is largely definitional. The government set the 2013 poverty level at $15,510 for a single parent with one child. If that parent married another single parent, and they each earned a below-poverty $15,000, their combined income of $30,000 would automatically put them above the official poverty line of $23,550 for a family of four.
Whats more, past attempts to boost marriage rates with grants to state marriage-skills programs havent worked. Long-term trends toward fewer marriages prevail across incomes, cultures and countries.
Its also possible that the absence of marriage doesnt cause poverty but that poverty causes less marriage. Black women, who make up a disproportionate number of single mothers, tell researchers they would like to be married but too often that means having another mouth to feed.
Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the Republican presidential aspirant who has taken up the issue, is right to worry about the consequences when children are raised by poor, single parents. But if were to be guided by the data, he could just as well tell parents Go to college as Get married. In 2009, the median income of families headed by a parent with a college degree was $100,000. The median income of households headed by a high-school dropout was $31,000.
What must come first are investments in poor children, regardless of their parents marital status. The United States needs policies that encourage kids to stay in school, and parents to work, and then supplements the incomes of the working poor. This path has more bipartisan support than direct cash benefits to able-bodied adults do.
And it works, as President Bill Clintons welfare reforms demonstrated.
In some cases, of course, marriage can benefit working parents.
But there are more effective and efficient ways for the government to reduce poverty. To suggest otherwise is to engage in a false debate.