You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.


  • Banks' wife wants to fill senator's job temporarily
    Amanda Banks, wife of Sen. Jim Banks, R-Columbia City, announced Thursday she will run to fill her husband’s vacancy in the Indiana Senate while he is deployed to Afghanistan during the 2015 legislative session.
  • Ellspermann touts $10.8 million for blighted homes
    Lt. Gov. Sue Ellspermann has announced grants she hopes will help prevent foreclosures and stabilize housing markets around the state.
  • Funding limit stops HIP sign-ups
    Indiana’s Healthy Indiana Plan for the working poor Thursday stopped enrolling new Hoosiers because of the insurance program hitting its financial maximum.

Lehman, others seek to amend gay-marriage resolution

INDIANAPOLIS – Three House Republicans - including Berne Rep. Matt Lehman – filed amendments Monday to strike a contentious second sentence from the gay marriage ban.

A Democratic member filed similar language.

But it was unclear Monday afternoon whether the amendments would be called as both the House Republican and Democratic members went into private caucuses to discuss the situation.

Lehman’s amendment made clear the process for amending the Indiana Constitution would start again, pushing any public vote until at least 2016.

Some supporters of the proposed amendment prefer keeping the language the same so it can be voted on by Hoosiers in November.

“I’m not afraid of the calendar,” Lehman said. “If we have to start over, so be it. Let’s get it right.”

The proposed amendment says, “Only a marriage between one (1) man and one (1) woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana.”

This language mirrors a state law already on the books.

But the second sentence of the proposal goes further, including banning civil unions in the future. It says, “A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.”

Lehman said he supports the amendment regardless, but believes the second sentence can be distorted by opponents in an attempt to defeat it in November.

Some, for instance, believe this language could stop universities and private businesses from offering health insurance to same-sex partners of employees.

For clarity, Lehman said, the second sentence needs to be removed so the key language defining marriage is not lost.