You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • US insolence exposed by futile Mideast talks
    The Israeli-Arab Palestinian peace talks are unraveling and on the verge of collapse. This was all too predictable, as we warned in The Journal Gazette last July when the Obama administration was starting negotiations.
  • Endorsements for contested nominations in the Republican primary
    Today through next Sunday, we will present endorsements for contested nominations in the May 6 Republican primary election. This spring, none of the Allen County Democratic primary candidates are contested.
  • Speech insufficient to halt home-grown terror
    Frazier Glenn Cross, the 73-year-old suspect in the April 13 fatal shooting of three people outside a Jewish Community Center near Kansas City, Mo., has a decades-long record of virulent white supremacism and anti-Semitism.
Advertisement
Associated Press
This June 6 file photo shows a sign outside the National Security Agency (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md.

Americans are owed accounting on NSA

The independent review of the National Security Agency’s spy programs puts the onus on President Barack Obama. He has to explain to the American people how the collection of metadata and other spying techniques are necessary tools to combat terrorism, and if he can’t, he’s got to abandon them.

That will mean a massive overhaul of NSA operations, including an end to the collection of Americans’ telephone records. The bigger question is whether the recommendations of the presidential panel go far enough in reining in the federal government’s attacks on privacy.

At stake is consumer trust in the privacy of all interactions involving the Internet, from telephone calls to texts to emails to the tracking of users’ locations and photographs. Obama had charged the panel with exploring the proper balance between national security and individual privacy.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, one of the authors of the Patriot Act, spoke for many in the tech community when he reacted to the report. He said the message to the NSA is now coming from every branch of government, from every corner of the nation: “NSA, you’ve gone too far.”

The president said last summer that the NSA’s surveillance techniques had stopped “at least 50” terrorist attacks.

But the review said specifically that the NSA’s techniques weren’t essential to thwarting terrorists.

The five-member panel wasn’t composed of academics or neophytes.

It included some of the foremost experts on terrorism in the world, including former acting CIA director Mike Morrell and Richard Clarke, a counter-terrorism adviser to President George W. Bush.

Their findings pretty much confirm what U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in his ruling on a lawsuit involving conservative legal activist Larry Klayman on the legality of the collection of phone data. He called the NSA program “likely unconstitutional” and “almost Orwellian” in nature.

Leon wrote, “the government does not cite a single case in which analysis of the NSA’s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent terrorist attack.”

The president is expected to announce in January whether he will accept or ignore the recommendations.

Protecting Americans from terrorist attacks has to be among the president’s top priorities. But it must not come at the expense of one of our most basic rights.

As Leon wrote, the federal government “may not hang a cloak of secrecy over the Constitution.”

As a candidate for president, Obama promised he would revisit the Patriot Act to ensure there is “real and robust oversight” of NSA operations.

He said he opposed the Bush administration’s position on warrantless wiretaps because “it crossed the line between protecting our national security and eroding the civil liberties of American citizens.”

The president has to fulfill his promise or explain why he’s changed his mind.

Advertisement