Theres something about Carrie White, the awkward, telekinetic teenager from Stephen Kings 1974 novel Carrie, that keeps inspiring visual interpretations.
Brian De Palmas 1976 film, which features Oscar-nominated performances by Sissy Spacek as Carrie and Piper Laurie as her unhinged mother, seems a definitive work. But producers see more to mine.
Carrie: The Musical, which flopped on Broadway in 1988, recently was retooled for off-Broadway and Seattle runs. In 1999, Amy Irving played a grown-up version of Sue Snell – her nice-girl character from the 1976 film – in the movie sequel The Rage: Carrie 2. In 2002, Patricia Clarkson played Carries mother in a TV adaptation.
The newest venture, now in movie theaters, is the most serious post-De Palma Carrie. Serious because it was directed by acclaimed independent filmmaker Kimberly Peirce, who directed 1999s Boys Dont Cry and the less-seen but affecting 2008 Iraq war drama Stop-Loss.
Chloë Grace Moretz stars in the titular role and Julianne Moore as her mother, Margaret.
In crafting her own film, Peirce worked from Kings book and from the De Palma film. Though her film stays true to both sources, its also set in the present day and views its story through the prism of modern life.
Reached by phone, Peirce said she views Kings fractured coming-of-age tale as timeless and timely, its themes of alienation and self-discovery lending themselves easily to todays technologically advanced world.
Here are some of Peirces other observations about re-imagining Carrie for a contemporary audience:
Like nothing theyve ever seen: Pierce entered the project assuming most people who will see this Carrie have not seen the De Palma film. Research screenings bore this out.
But people who have seen the original will pick up Peirces homages to De Palma by slow-motion shots and the muscle car driven by teen hothead Billy (Alex Russell).
Keeping her religion: Fundamentalist religion has risen in visibility in the United States since the first films release. Presenting Margaret White as a wing-nut, the way she was in the original, would have carried more potential to offend.
You had to be very careful how you represented Margaret as a religious person in order to show due respect to religion, and to characterize her accurately, Peirce said. That is why it is so great that King (in his novel) gave us permission to make it very specific. It was a very safe road because (Margaret) has created her own religion. In our film, we added a new line where Carrie says, Thats not even in the Bible (to her mother). Margaret has made it up. ... She is in her own world.
New tools for tormenting: Carrie still wears figure-hiding, era-unspecific baggy clothes sewn by her seamstress mother. But her fellow teens wear more modern fashions, carry cellphones and upload video to social media.
Life has radically changed; ... radically radically in the last five, Peirce said. We have cellphones, we are always taking a picture, we are always recording video. We oftentimes are experiencing something and are compelled to be recording it on some level. Its just not enough to just experience it.
The mean behavior directed toward Carrie in the novel and De Palma film becomes even more public in the new Carrie, when Carries schoolmate Chris (Portia Doubleday) uploads to social media some video footage of Carrie shot during a heartbreaking moment.