CHICAGO – The nations most influential pediatricians group says the health benefits of circumcision in newborn boys outweigh any risks and insurance companies should pay for it.
In its latest policy statement on circumcision, a procedure that has been declining nationwide, the American Academy of Pediatrics moves closer to an endorsement but says the decision should be up to parents.
Its not a verdict from on high, said policy co-author Dr. Andrew Freedman. Theres not a one-size-fits-all-answer.
But from a medical standpoint, circumcisions benefits in reducing risk of disease outweigh its small risks, said Freedman, a pediatric urologist in Los Angeles.
Recent research bolstering evidence that circumcision reduces chances of infection with HIV and other sexually spread diseases, urinary tract infections and penis cancer influenced the academy to update its 13-year-old policy.
The old stance said potential medical benefits were not sufficient to warrant recommending routinely circumcising newborn boys. The new one says, The benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for those families who choose it. The academy also says pain relief stronger than a sugar-coated pacifier is essential, usually an injection to numb the area.
The federal Centers for Disease Control and Convention has estimated circumcision costs range from about $200 to $600 nationwide. Coverage varies among insurers, and several states have stopped Medicaid funding for circumcisions.
The new policy was published online today in Pediatrics. It comes amid ongoing debate over whether circumcision is medically necessary or a cosmetic procedure that critics say amounts to genital mutilation.
Circumcision involves removing foreskin at the tip of the penis. The procedure can reduce germs that can grow underneath the foreskin, and complications, including bleeding and infection, are rare, the academy says.
Psychologist Ronald Goldman, director of an anti-circumcision group, the Circumcision Resource Center, said studies show circumcision causes loss of sexual satisfaction – a claim the academy said is not supported by the research it reviewed – and can be psychologically harming. Goldman contends medical studies showing benefits are flawed.
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists took part in the research review that led to the new policy and has endorsed it. Circumcisions in hospitals are typically performed by obstetricians or pediatricians.
The American Medical Association and American Academy of Family Physicians have neutral policies similar to the pediatrics academys previous position.
Philadelphia social worker Shannon Coyne examined medical research on circumcision before her son was born last September and had a tough time making a decision. She learned that a relatives boy needed reconstructive surgery after a botched circumcision, and that anothers son who wasnt circumcised developed urinary infections.
Coyne said she and her husband ultimately decided against circumcision, because she didnt want her baby to have what she considers cosmetic surgery without being able to consent.
Her advice to other parents is just make an informed decision. Do your research, be open-minded.