You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Movies

  • Some directors just keep on rolling
    Visiting a retired Frank Capra at his Sierra Nevada hideaway, Clint Eastwood was baffled.“I always thought: ‘He could be making a film right now. He’s as lucid as could be. Here̵ ...
  • Don't waste brain power thinking on plot
    'Lucy'So let's start with the enticing premise of Luc Besson's “Lucy,” starring Scarlett Johansson: Human beings use only 10 percent of their brain capacity. Imagin ...
  • Levine draws from life in indie ‘Begin Again’
    Adam Levine knows pop stars-turned-actors are greeted suspiciously. And he’s hesitant to make any grandiose declarations about suddenly transforming into an actor. But he also can’t help himself.
Advertisement

Reality inspires ‘Bourne’ boss

Gilroy

– “The Bourne Legacy” is a work of fiction, but the scientific, political and corporate partnerships it depicts are very real.

Tony Gilroy, a writer on the first three “Bourne” films and writer-director of this latest installment, spent countless hours immersed in military and intelligence research to tell the story of CIA assassin Jason Bourne.

When tasked with expanding Bourne’s universe for “Legacy,” Gilroy again looked to reality: Hundreds – if not thousands – of secret government and quasi-government programs funded by millions of dollars with little oversight, all designed to build better weapons and better soldiers.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which performs research for the U.S. Department of Defense, is just one organization developing the kinds of programs that would fit perfectly into Bourne’s world: Not just high-tech weapons and robotic prostheses, but advances in neuroscience to help reduce battlefield stress, hasten learning, improve analytic capabilities and even engender trust.

Gilroy talked with The Associated Press about his inspiration for the story and why truth can be stranger than fiction.

Q. How did you go about broadening the “Bourne” world?

A. There needed to be a pulling back the curtain, a much larger conspiracy. Edward Norton has his agency that he’s carved out there at the center of the Beltway, and (we) found a niche for him in the military-industrial-corporate espinocracy food chain, found a good place for his agency to fit. ... It has all of the funding and all of the motivation and all of the secrecy that we would expect with a government program, but then it has all the lack of oversight, the human error, that we know always comes with everything. So we set Edward’s agency there, in that sort of sweet spot there.

Q. Did you discover anything so far-fetched that moviegoers might not believe is true?

A. I wanted to keep everything really kitchen sinky and crude and authentic and real and did not want to have it feel science fiction, and I knew that what we were talking about is really on the way here or certainly a lot of people have it up on the chalkboard. ... The thing that seemed most applicable to me and that helped me most in my story was gene doping, genomic alteration. That was a little bit sexier and a little more on the horizon than some of the other things. It’s kind of fascinating, in the last month, since the Olympics have come up, I’ve seen two mainstream articles – the scientists who are responsible for doing all the drug testing for all the athletes, that’s their cutting edge. That’s their next (question), how do we monitor gene doping. And they don’t know how to do it and it’s really fascinating. The scenario is they introduce chromosomal gene doping through a synthetic virus. And that’s happening now. That’s what Olympic doctors are worried about ... .

Q. Writing the three previous “Bourne” movies must have made stepping into the director’s role more thrilling.

A. With the trepidation of not wanting to have people think that you’re doing science fiction. We’re not really going for any suspension of disbelief here, so it’s a little bit tricky to try to convince everybody that this is really on somebody’s menu.

Q. After all your research in this area, has anyone from the intelligence community ever contacted you, either admiringly or threateningly?

A. No. I have some other friends who troll the same sort of espionage porn that I do and dig around, and we always wonder if we’re entering this number of search words all the time, what metrics are you entering into in some gathering site somewhere? I don’t know. I don’t think that’s overly paranoid. But no one’s ever contacted me.

Advertisement