CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa – They were learning to become truck drivers but wound up in a nightmare. In detailed accounts to a federal agency, dozens of female employees of one of the nation’s largest trucking companies told of being propositioned, groped and even assaulted by male drivers during cross-country training rides.
I was beaten, I was fondled, I was humiliated and I was taught nothing, one trainee, Ramona Villareal, said in a deposition.
But rather than leading to a workplace discrimination judgment, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s sexual harassment lawsuit against Cedar Rapids, Iowa-based CRST Van Expedited Inc., has backfired and put the agency on trial. The agency is coping with a court ruling that could make it more difficult and more expensive to pursue large discrimination cases against companies in the Midwest, if not nationwide.
And dozens of women who described an ordeal of unwanted and aggressive sexual conduct may receive no compensation for lost wages or emotional distress because of judicial criticism of the agency’s investigation.
A February ruling in the case sets a new standard for workplace class-action lawsuits in the federal court district that includes Iowa, Arkansas, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska and the Dakotas. Before filing a lawsuit on behalf of employees alleging similar discrimination, the agency will first have to investigate the merits of every worker’s claim and attempt to reach settlements. If the agency doesn’t, EEOC risks having the case dismissed.
The agency has argued that such a standard is impractical in cases involving hundreds or thousands of potential victims. At a minimum, the agency says, investigations would take longer and delay relief compared to other regions, where class-action cases can be filed with a lower standard. The EEOC has a deadline next week to determine whether to appeal.
We are an agency with limited resources already, and this is something that, if it stands, would make it even more challenging for us to address and vindicate discriminatory violations in the 8th Circuit, said P. David Lopez, general counsel for the EEOC.
But businesses say the ruling could stop unfair legal tactics and prevent unnecessary and expensive litigation.
It’s incredibly significant, said Chicago lawyer Gerald Maatman, who represents companies sued by the EEOC. It is a signal by the federal courts that the tactics the EEOC has been using over the last several years may be improper.
The ruling came as the agency has made systemic discrimination cases – those involving many employees – a larger enforcement priority.
The EEOC investigates 100,000 complaints of workplace discrimination annually and recovered more than $450 million for employees last year.
The agency’s tactics have rattled the business community, which says lawsuits can cost millions of dollars and destroy reputations.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the CRST case denouncing EEOC’s tactics and calling for the agency to be more cooperative with industry.